|
|
Davis: A George Allen Republican? |
|

Davis (speaking) introduces Allen at Hampton University in April 06. Davis also appeared for Allen in a Sept event held to help Allen recover from his "Macaca Moment." Their records are indistinguishable
|
|
Schiavo Subpoena |
|
See the subpoenas for Terro and Michael Schaivo, signed by Tom Davis. |
|
Time for the Truth About Tom Davis |
|
Davis and Devolites Enterprises |
|
Thursday, 08 February 2007 |
|
Track voting and evaluation of "moderate" "Rank and File Republican" Tom Davis www.govtrack.us/congress. Vanity Fair Jack Abramoff: Any important Republican who comes out and says they didn't know me is almost certainly lying," he says. Such lies are not just, well, lies, but dumb to boot, he adds, for, as his own humiliations suggest, old e-mails never die; they just sit on hard drives, waiting to be subpoenaed and then to be leaked to the press. "This is not an age when you can run away from facts," he declares. "I had to deal with my records, and others will have to deal with theirs."
When will Jack Abramoff's list of co-conspirators come out? How can Tom Davis avoid being on it? Abramoff emails here Capital Corruption here Follow the money here $ $ $
Fairfax Connection I was ... extremely disappointed to see that State Sen. Jeannemarie Devolites-Davis (R-34), voted against this reform bill. Then I remembered that Sen. Devolites-Davis was the chief patron of the redistricting bill in 2001 which created her own current Senate seat and "protected" the Congressional seat of her future husband U.S. Rep. Tom Davis (R-11) through a bit of fancy gerrymandering. Her recent vote shows the continuing conflict of interest she has between a reform benefiting Virginia voters, and protecting the position of U.S. Rep. Tom Davis. I believe we Fairfax voters deserve better. |
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 13 February 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Wednesday, 22 November 2006 |
|
Tom Davis won't reveal the names of clients who hired ICG, his wife's firm, so they can get a favorable hearing like the ones described by the Boston Globe, or so the money might persuade Davis to allow them to avoid a hearing altogether. The Department of Homeland Security officials were so distraught with the forced contracts that the DHS hired its own auditor to report on the matter. According to the Post: The assessment underscores complaints by department auditors and outside experts that procurement officials persistently neglected contracting responsibilities as they spent billions of dollars after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks -- much of it on security systems that do not work as planned. "This strongly suggests that we're buying the wrong stuff, the wrong way, possibly from the wrong contractors, and failing to check before, during or after," said Charles Tiefer, an expert on government contracting who teaches at the University of Baltimore School of Law. The confidential report, delivered to department officials in March, focused on spending in fiscal 2005 by the Office of Procurement Operations. During that period, nearly $17.5 billion was spent department-wide on contracts for a variety of goods and services, including security at airports and borders, radiation-detection monitors, and information technology consultants. 
The expose, by the same two Post reporters who wrote about ICG in June, is called “Report Finds DHS Lax on Contracting Procedures,” By Robert O'Harrow Jr. and Scott Higham, Staff Writers, Wednesday, November 22, 2006; Page A01 See the list of potential ICG clients here (pdf file) |
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 22 November 2006 )
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 1 2 Next > End >>
|
|
|